<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just What Did Happen In Noah&#039;s Flood?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bible-matters.com/just-what-did-happen-in-noahs-flood-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bible-matters.com/just-what-did-happen-in-noahs-flood-2/</link>
	<description>The Ministry Website of Andrew Drapper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:17:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://bible-matters.com/just-what-did-happen-in-noahs-flood-2/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 18:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">29 at http://bible-matters.com#comment-48</guid>
		<description>A great flood is not supported by any credible means of scientific proof.

Prove to me that it happened, and maybe you can save my &#039;soul&#039;.

Referencing the bible does not count, I don&#039;t accept accounts, I want hard evidence that isn&#039;t open to interpretation.

What I want from you people, if I am to believe you, is a scientific argument that starts in the following way:

&quot;Suppose that there wasn&#039;t a great flood as portrayed in the bible.&quot;
Now I want you to find contradictions to this supposition, thus concluding that there was a great flood as portrayed in the bible.

This means of proof will force you to encounter hard science which, as I challenge, will make it impossible to find contradictions to the supposition.
Now I don&#039;t want to see anything which is psudo-scientific, for example Radio Carbon Dating is accurate and I will not accept anything which includes alternatives to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great flood is not supported by any credible means of scientific proof.</p>
<p>Prove to me that it happened, and maybe you can save my &#8217;soul&#8217;.</p>
<p>Referencing the bible does not count, I don&#8217;t accept accounts, I want hard evidence that isn&#8217;t open to interpretation.</p>
<p>What I want from you people, if I am to believe you, is a scientific argument that starts in the following way:</p>
<p>&#8220;Suppose that there wasn&#8217;t a great flood as portrayed in the bible.&#8221;<br />
Now I want you to find contradictions to this supposition, thus concluding that there was a great flood as portrayed in the bible.</p>
<p>This means of proof will force you to encounter hard science which, as I challenge, will make it impossible to find contradictions to the supposition.<br />
Now I don&#8217;t want to see anything which is psudo-scientific, for example Radio Carbon Dating is accurate and I will not accept anything which includes alternatives to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
