“I think the “Adapting” was from Eric.”
I see you didn’t contradict his answers. So I would presume you agree with them – the “adaptation” and all that. I wouldn;t blame you though for disagreeing with him as he does seem to have got all his facts wrong. Ask him while you are there to explain the sifting by weight thing that the incredibly quickly formed fossils did after the great flood so that they all managed to end up in the right sediment layers for their relative age. Except of course they didn’t because for instance where are all the human remains that are mixed in with those of the dinosaurs?
I was in the Natural History Museum last week. I was looking carefully on your behalf and I didn’t see any mention of great floods, gardens of eden and the like. No sign of humans in with the dinosaur exhibits either. Are all these scientist people lying in your opinion?

Even the simplest research shows that you are way out with your dates.
From Wiki:

The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) considers the earliest evidence to suggest complete reef structures to have been 600,000 years ago. According to the GBRMPA, the current, living reef structure is believed to have begun growing on the older platform about 20,000 years ago. The Australian Institute of Marine Science agrees, which places the beginning of the growth of the current reef at the time of the Last Glacial Maximum. At around that time, the sea level was 120 metres (390 ft) lower than it is today.

According to the GBRMPA, the current, living reef structure is believed to have begun growing on the older platform about 20,000 years ago. The Australian Institute of Marine Science agrees, which places the beginning of the growth of the current reef at the time of the Last Glacial Maximum. At around that time, the sea level was 120 metres (390 ft) lower than it is today.

From 20,000 years ago until 6,000 years ago, the sea level rose steadily. As it rose, the corals could then grow higher on the hills of the coastal plain. By around 13,000 years ago the sea level was 60 metres (200 ft) lower than the present day, and corals began to grow around the hills of the coastal plain, which were, by then, continental islands. As the sea level rose further still, most of the continental islands were submerged. The corals could then overgrow the hills, to form the present cays and reefs. Sea level on the Great Barrier Reef has not risen significantly in the last 6,000 years. The CRC Reef Research Centre estimates the age of the present, living reef structure at 6,000 to 8,000 years old.[22]

The remains of an ancient barrier reef similar to the Great Barrier Reef can be found in The Kimberley, a northern region of Western Australia.

Sorry but your ignorance of geological processes is staggering. To ignore every single scrap of real evidence and say that the Himalaya were knocked out a few thousand years ago is just utterly ridiculous. You teach your kids this do you Andrew? If so you should be ashamed of yourself. Same goes for the ocean salinity explanation. Look up plate tectonics and get back to me regarding where it says anything about such major gelogical features being anything less than billions of years old.
You’ll no doubt quote the “runaway subduction” pseudo scientific notion which itself is absolutely contradicted by massive amounts of geological evidence, and indeed evidence from just about every area of modern physical science.

“Fresh water animals have adapted, (I would not use the word evolved because of the assumptions that word brings up)”
In this case what does “adapt” mean?